Database Transactional-Based Fraud: Enhancing Transaction Security and Addressing the Halloween Problem

By | November 23, 2016
Database Transactional-Based Fraud: Enhancing Transaction Security and Addressing the Halloween Problem

Database Transactional-Based Fraud: Enhancing Transaction Security and Addressing the Halloween Problem

 

Database Transactional-Based Fraud: Enhancing Transaction Security and Addressing the Halloween Problem

Revised June 24, 2023

This article explores the risks associated with database transactional-based fraud, focusing on attacks targeting external interfaces and their potential impact on data integrity and availability. It also addresses the concept of the “Halloween Problem” in SQL and proposes mechanisms to detect and mitigate these risks.

Understanding the “Halloween Problem”:

The SQL”Halloween Problem”.

This problem arises when a SQL UPDATE query unintentionally affects more records than intended, leading to unintended consequences.

Back in 1976, Don Chamberlin and Pat Selinger came across a unique problem. It just so happened that without protection, a query could continue forever (or give results you did not expect). The name is not descriptive of the nature of the problem but rather was given due to the day it was discovered on.

“Halloween Problem” Example:

Let’s say we have a table called “Employees” with the following columns: “EmployeeID,” “Salary,” and “Position.” We want to give a 10% raise to every employee who earns less than $25,000. We might write the following query:

UPDATE Employees
SET Salary = Salary * 1.1
WHERE Salary < 25000;

However, the “Halloween Problem” occurs when the query keeps giving 10% raises until everyone earns at least $25,000. Let’s say we have an employee with a salary of $20,000. After the first iteration of the query, the salary becomes $22,000. But since it still meets the condition (salary < 25000), the query executes again, resulting in a salary of $24,200. This process continues indefinitely, causing an unintended increase in salaries.

While the SQL standard specifies a three-phase execution process to ensure consistency, there are performance considerations when implementing these phases in a database engine. An alternative strategy, processing the UPDATE operation row by row, minimizes memory requirements and redundant operations.

The “Halloween Problem” highlights the issue of how the database engine should handle updates that affect the same records being evaluated. It is crucial to implement proper safeguards to prevent unintended consequences and ensure the correctness of data modifications.

Database Malicious Transactions Detector (DBMTD):

To combat malicious transactions, it is suggested to use a Database Malicious Transactions Detector (DBMTD). The DBMTD consists of two phases: transaction profiling and intrusion detection. Transaction profiling involves identifying authorized transactions and representing them as directed graphs. The DBMTD autonomously runs an auditing mechanism to collect information about user commands and transaction execution paths, comparing them against pre-defined profiles to detect suspicious activities.

By comprehending the risks associated with database transactional-based fraud and understanding the intricacies of the “Halloween Problem,” organizations can implement effective measures to mitigate risks, enhance transaction security, and maintain data integrity. The proposed DBMTD mechanism and awareness of the challenges in SQL UPDATE operations provide valuable insights for database administrators and security professionals.

 

References

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.476.3656&rep=rep1&type=pdf

http://sqlperformance.com/2013/02/t-sql-queries/halloween-problem-part-1

https://sqlperformance.com/2013/02/t-sql-queries/halloween-problem-part-1

https://sqlperformance.com/2013/02/t-sql-queries/halloween-problem-part-2

http://www.divyaaradhya.com/2016/11/12/database-transactions-fraud-security-and-the-halloween-problem/

Additional Articles and Content

Schema-Based Access Control for SQL Server Databases

Guidelines for Media and Data Sanitizing

NoSQL Databases vs Relational Databases: A Comparative Analysis

Exploring the Implications of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence in Texas Higher Education: Ethical Considerations, Privacy, and Security

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX): Strengthening Financial Reporting and Accountability

Compression of Network Data and Performance Issues

 

Note: This article has been drafted and improved with the assistance of AI, incorporating ChatGTP suggestions and revisions to enhance clarity and coherence. The original research, decision-making, and final content selection were performed by a human author.

Disclaimer

Terms and Conditions of Use

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *